On social media

01 July 2015

Lessons For India From Greece

Hopefully, readers won’t find the comparisons Greek. The European country is a typical example of the ultimate fate socialism and populism meet. India, beware!

In terms of economics, this is the chronology that unfolded in Greece, which the whole news media is talking about today.
  • Greece enters Eurozone in 2001.
  • Unfortunately Europe goes into recession around 2008. Greece being poor, suffers more with 28 per cent unemployment.
  • Being part of Eurozone, Greece can’t print more drachma to reduce its value in international market and make Greek exports attractive.
  • The German-dominated European Central Bank is right for a robust Germany, does not work for a weak Greece.
  • Debt burden on Greece today: 177 per cent of its GDP.
  • Greece must come up with a loan payment of $1.8 billion to the IMF by yesterday, literally — 30 June — to avoid a default.
  • Constant government borrowing to fund promises by politicians causes Greece’s cash crunch.
  • Early retirement age of 57 years adds to the government’s pension burden. In 2012, “when the minimum wage of €751 was slashed by 22 per cent (or 32 per cent for under 25s), the government cut the basic rate of unemployment benefits back from €460 to €360 a month,” reported The Irish Times.
  • “The wage bill of the Greek public sector doubles in 12-odd years, in real terms — and that number does not take into account the bribes collected by public officials. The average government job pays almost three times the average private sector job. The national railroad has annual revenues of €100 million against an annual wage bill of €400 million, plus €300 million in other expenses,” says a book and an article by Michael Lewis, and a book by John Mauldin and Jonathan Tepper.
  • “It’s said that the Greek railway network is so underused and oversubsidised that it would be cheaper to put the train passengers into taxis. A cab from Thessaloniki to Athens would cost €700 — that’s about €1.20 a kilometre, double the amount being paid to send people by train, if there is only one person in the taxi. The average state railroad employee earns €65,000 a year,” BBC reported. And it’s public money that runs the railways.
  • The government led by Lukas Papademos that begins its innings in November 2011 has to enter a €130-billion loan agreement to meet public demand. The Greek central bank flies more than €5 billion in new bills into the country from the central banks of Italy and Austria in order to cover outstanding demand. All local banks go bust by early 2012.
  • The European Commission, the European Central Bank, and the IMF (referred, sometimes pejoratively by Greece’s socialist populace, as the “Troika”) finally offer Greece loan under the condition of steep hike in taxes and cuts in spending; Greece accepts the conditions and gets €240 billion ($268.8 billion); but this leads to domestic resentment; the people bring a leftist government to get more government aid.
  • Choices before Greece now: accept more austerity as demanded by the Troika, or exit the Eurozone; referendum on 5 July.
  • Defaulting on repayment is almost certain because most of the bailout money Greece receives is used to repay loans from its creditors. “It is virtually impossible for Greece to pay down its enormous debt when the economy is under-performing,” believes Adam Shell, columnist with USA Today.
  • With the possibility of Greek deposits in Euro soon turning into devalued drachmas, Greeks rush to ATMs to withdraw Euros for more value for their money; reacting to the development, its government shuts down banks.
  • ECB is likely to cut off its emergency cash infusions to Greek banks. Greece won’t get loans on palatable terms, forcing immediate and severe adjustments; Greek banks are likely to collapse, crippling whatever is left of the economy.
  • However, the Eurozone economy has left the bad times behind, thanks mainly to the ECB’s government bond-buying programme which was designed to boost the economy by keeping rates low and heightening economic activity; the 19-country Eurozone has emerged from recession and is growing at 0.4 per cent.
But how did things come to such a pass in Greece?
Greeks demonstrating against austerity and loan repayment yesterday
Courtesy: Business Insider
Populism began in Greece in the 1970s after a brief flirt with liberal economics. The Panhellenic Socialist Movement’s (PASOK’s) Andreas Papandreou promised the moon in this decade and, winning on that promise in 1981, began implementing the promises. The first of those was increasing people’s income through state employment and pensions; the total public sector employment in Greece increased during the 1980s at an average annual rate of about 4 per cent — around four times as fast as in the private sector. This is a lesson for India’s inflationary and exchequer-draining Pay Commissions.
Then, successive PASOK governments turned less and less liberal and either ignored institutions or subverted them in the name of “people’s rule”. And it helped the party win several elections. This is a warning call for those who vote for a rabble-rousing party that promises “Swaraj”: the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). The fascination with “rule and economy by the people” never went out of favour of the Greeks.
“For most of the 1980s and 1990s, Greek interest rates had run a full 10 per cent higher than German ones, as Greeks were regarded as far less likely to repay a loan. There was no consumer credit in Greece: Greeks didn’t have credit cards. Greeks didn’t usually have mortgage loans, either,” Michael Lewis wrote in Boomerang: Travels in the New Third World.
A liberal Constantine Mitsotakis won in 1990 but lost power to Papandreou again in 1993. You may compare this with Narendra Modi’s win across India in 2014, which was a vote against the Sonia Gandhi-Manmohan Singh government’s bad economics, and its subsequent loss in Delhi in 2015, where people reposed faith in and voted for populist promises of freebies.
Take a free ride, AAP: Delhi is Greece!
By now, the Greek society had gotten used to the doles and was expecting more. Reform had turned into a suicidal idea for the country’s political parties. Entitlements were offered for votes. The scale of Greek tax cheating is at least as incredible as its scope. Lewis reported in Vanity Fair that “an estimated two-thirds of Greek doctors report incomes under €12,000 a year because incomes below that amount weren’t taxable, which means that even plastic surgeons making millions a year pay no tax at all”. The law made it a jailable offence to cheat the government out of more than €150,000 alright, but no ruling party enforced it. Else, every doctor in Greece would be in jail!
Politicians obliged; they gave the people the foolish policies they asked for. And on occasions where they desperately turned bold, they were punished at the polls. Remember how the AAP demanded in 2013 that those who participated in their “civil disobedience movement” by not paying their electricity bills be given amnesty by law?
The AAP promise that is yet to be fulfilled  — fortunately or unfortunately
The court ruled out selective application of law, but politically the AAP reaped the benefits in 2015, getting slum dwellers’ votes en masse. They also lapped up the promise of free water in a state where thirsty pockets had no pipelines, and electric supply at half the tariff with the other half being subsidised. This meant bribing us with our own money, but the lowest common denominator couldn’t care less for this brazen, immoral economics. And the BJP’s offer of electric service portability, like mobile telephony portability, had no takers in this year’s Delhi election.
Gauging a similar public mood in Greece, two new kids on the block — leftist Democratic Social Movement (DIKKI) under former PASOK minister of Finance, Dimitris Tsovolas and rightist Popular Orthodox Rally (LAOS), which was founded in 2000 by George Karatzaferis, a former National Democracy (ND) deputy — competed in demanding more populist measures in their respective ways from the government.
Domestic populism apart, the Greeks also wanted to grow big and be in international reckoning. For that, they needed entry into the Eurozone. The countries running it said they would let Greece into the club if it could tame its wild budgetary deficit and bring it down to 3 per cent of the GDP. By 2000, Greece managed it with statistical manipulation.
The manipulation continued after Greece’s entry into the Eurozone. Miranda Xafa, a former IMF official turned economic adviser to former Greek Prime Minister Mitsotakis-turned-Salomon Brothers analyst, pointed out in 1998 that if you added up all the Greek budget deficits over the previous 15 years, they amounted to only half the Greek debt. That is, the amount of money the Greek government had borrowed to fund its operations was twice its declared shortfalls. “At Salomon we used to call him (the then head of the Greek National Statistical Service) ‘the Magician,’” says Xafa, “because of his ability to magically make inflation, the deficit, and the debt disappear”, wrote Lewis in the essay cited above.
The minority question
Now we come to studying the political right wing in that country and ours — especially what they do to develop their own vote banks in reaction to the vote banks developed through entitlements and appeasement politics. Patriotism, which is a noble philosophy, turns into supremacist nationalism in order to cultivate the fringe elements as votaries of one’s party (but they stop short of demanding full re-establishment of the ancient world).
The way the extreme Hindu right-wing demands Akhand Bharat (meaning annexation of Pakistan and Bangladesh), the Greek right wing Golden Dawn has been demanding annexation of Albania and Turkey including the Turkish cities of Istanbul and Izmir (but not the full territory under the ancient Greek civilisation). Another right wing party LAOS is anti-American and anti-Semitist.
At the other end, while minorities are adequately represented in Greece —  currently represented in Parliament by the PASOK’s Çetin Mandacı and Ahmet Hacıosman — they do not stop complaining. It’s not new. During the 2002 local elections, approximately 250 Muslim municipal and prefectural councillors and mayors were elected, and the Vice-Prefect of Rhodope is a Muslim, too. Yet, look at their grievance mongering. Muslims don’t object when the Turkish state appoints muftis, but they disagree when the Greek state does so. Importantly, these muftis perform several judicial functions and, hence, cannot be let loose by the State. But as is seen in the Human Rights Watch’s pro-minority tilt in India, it is pro-minority in Greece, too.
And comparable to our problem of Bangladeshi infiltrators, Greeks have a problem in identifying who all sneaked in. So they developed an Article 19 of the Greek Citizenship Code, which allowed the government to revoke the citizenship of non-ethnic Greeks who left the country. Finally this law had to be scrapped in 1998 under domestic pressure from minorities and international pressure exerted by bleeding-heart human rights activists and countries supportive of them.
All this irks the ethnic Greek majority in the country. They hit back with orthodoxy and branding.
Activists of the Greek right wing Anexartitoi Ellines (ANEL) uphold family values and promote Greek orthodox religion. They don’t care for the liberal philosophy that a citizen’s family is no business of the State or a political party. ANEL’s second agenda has an Indian parallel: the attempt to regiment Hindus along the lines of radical Islam. If moderate and extremist Muslims are ‘good’ and ‘bad’ Muslim  — or ‘true’ Muslims or un-Islamic apostates — depending on who the accuser and the accused are, if you do not agree with the Hindu right, you are a traitor or Jaichand (who betrayed Prithviraj Chauhan to Mohammad Ghori) in popular parlance.
How to pander and ruin a country
The political right wing in any country is often found leftist in economics. In India, they demand that FDI in retail and GM crops in agriculture should not be allowed. In Greece, they demand that only ‘pure Greeks’ be allowed into “poor people’s kitchens” — a programme of the Golden Dawn like Amma’s Kitchens started by J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu. To hell with competition and inclusion!
While some grievances of the majority in both India and Greece are legitimate, they forget a political theory proven historically right always: The rich turn averse to politics because activism does not suit business. If the minorities turn rabid in their demands every now and then, the best way to tackle them is to see them flourish economically.
An Azim Premji, for example, will never join a demonstration at the Jama Masjid to demand that the Indian Parliament condemn Israel’s actions in Palestine like a poor Muslim barber, cobbler, manual scavenger or craftsman would, just as a Mukesh Ambani or Gautam Adani won’t demand a Ram temple — like an unemployed Hindu youth of Uttar Pradesh would, ferociously. Business, employment and income growth of citizens are the most effective antidotes to people’s communal and other sectarian tendencies.
Now let’s study the socialist parallels. In October 2009, like Arvind Kejriwal’s leitmotifs Ambani and Adani, PASOK’s leader George Papandreou, son of the party founder, won by a landslide after a bitter campaign dominated by his slogan, “The money exists; it is only that [the ND government] prefers to give it to the few and powerful.” Any hope of revival of Greece died thereafter. The news we are getting from that country’s government and people today also is of defiance in the face of inevitable disaster.
Comparable to India Against Corruption and the Aam Aadmi Party’s “sab chor hain”/ “all parties and politicians are corrupt” campaign beginning 2011-12 —  but violent in manifestation unlike the Indian counterpart — Greeks went berserk with strikes, picketing, sloganeering, sit-ins and attacks on public and private properties. MPs were assaulted and Parliament was assailed. Hate crimes against immigrants rose during the period beginning with the first bailout (May 2010) and ending with the general elections of June 2012.
The radicalisation of the Greek electorate culminated with the advent of the Greek indignados — literally, “the outraged”. They were a bunch of activists who hogged the country’s city squares for many weeks in the turbulent summer of 2011. Like the activists in India that year, the Greeks had problems not only with the old ruling parties but also with the whole political class. They all demanded “sovereignty of the people”. In the parallel movement in Delhi, Kejriwal declared Anna Hazare was greater than Parliament of India!
There is another lesson Kejriwal must have taken from Greece. On the organisational side, Panos Kammenos never misses a chance to claim that ANEL is a movement, rather than a party, born from within the popular mobilisations of 2011 and organised through Facebook and Twitter. Yet, the party remains a personality cult. ANEL’s leader employs rhetoric that is broadly based on two mail pillars: anti-corruption and the conspiracy of the New World Order.
As an MP of ND, he conducted extensive researches to establish conspiracies or mishandling of public finances. Kammenos was also litigious. And he branded whoever disagreed with him as sycophants of his political adversaries. He found the governing coalitions after 2011 collaborators in misappropriations [Takis S Pappas and Paris Aslanidis].
In the meantime, another India-like event happened in Greek politics. In the manner in which the AAP drew its initial campaigners from the BJP and voters from Congress vote banks, the Coalition of the Radical Left (SYRIZA) in Greece, most popular with wage earners, the unemployed and university students, drew 39 per cent of its votes from PASOK, 12 per cent from ND and 26 per cent from other sources [ibid].
Reforms vs populism
Now go back to India of 1991-92 and compare the Troika’s demands on Greece for a loan extension with the IMF and the World Bank’s  conditions for loans imposed on the P.V. Narasimha Rao government following India’s balance of payment and gold mortgage crises, which the then prime minister accepted, unleashing liberalization, but then losing in the 1996 elections, when the people find allegations of corruption against his government more significant than the lakhs of Indians he helped turn rich. [Few, if any, of those allegations stood the scrutiny of courts of law.]
But populism is so mad that it can topple the greatest of populists. Like MGNREGA and Food Security Act couldn’t save the Sonia-Manmohan government, in Greece it couldn’t save Papandreou either. He resigned in November 2011.
Whereas the ND regained some votes from its abysmal performance in May 2012, its score was below 30 per cent. Will populism deal a similar blow to India’s NDA? Like the present government here refuses to scrap the schemes launched by the Congress though it had campaigned against them, ND first campaigned against bailouts while in the opposition, but later supported the Papademos Cabinet. The way the ND’s followers dumped the party for this U-turn, will the BJP’s dump theirs in 2019?
Why we’re doing better than Greece
If despite such astonishing parallels between Greece and India, we are not collapsing, it is because we are a much larger and varied society and economy, which does not earn from international sources from tourism alone, unlike the poor European country. But socialism and misplaced right wing jingoism are certainly holding us back from what we could achieve. If India had been Delhi, the country would have gone to the dogs by now — with a Congress-Janata-AAP combine’s freebies, entitlements, goonda rajand appeasement politics gaining popularity, forcing the BJP-Shiv Sena-Akali Dal combine to take recourse to Hindu-Marathi-Sikh sub-nationalism, phobia of competition in the market and aversion to scholarly science and history in education.
Thank God, India is too big to fall for such petty political games. But God does not and will not stand by idiots and cowards always. If the right wing believes the left wing is wrong, it is stupid to try matching the rival’s populism with one’s own. The party that can deliver us from the gloom is one which does something unique, something none dares to adopt: right-wing economics — a pro-consumer, money-generating, poverty-alleviating, booming, vibrant India.
Following Greece’s apparently inevitable ouster from the Eurozone, the remaining, robust economies of the continent are likely to slash lending rates in trying to make themselves an attractive investment destination. India’s Finance Secretary Rajiv Mehrishi has said that the economic crisis in Greece may trigger capital outflows from India. Engineering exports from India may be impacted as the European Union is the largest destination for such shipments. There could be some temporary volatility in the financial market and if a Greece exit happens, then rupee might depreciate.
Robust forex reserves, which are at an all-time high of $355 billion, may cushion any possible impact of the crisis, and growth in India is anyway driven by domestic demand. Besides, the Greek situation has been developing for some time now, which has given our policy makers time to prepare contingency measures [The Times of India]. But we know from the 2008-09 American subprime mortgage crisis that these factors could not prevent a slowdown in India. There is no alternative to fast second-generation reforms. One hopes that Narendra Modi and Arun Jaitley will rise to the occasion.

Further references

Political developments in Greece:
  • Greek Populism: A Political Drama in Five Acts by Takis S Pappas and Paris Aslanidis;
  • National populism and xenophobia in Greece by Aristos Doxiadis and Manos Matsaganis;
  • Parties and Elections in Europe – Greece by Wolfram Nordsieck;
  • The European Union beyond the Crisis: Evolving Governance, Contested Policies, and Disenchanted Publics by
    Boyka M Stefanova, page 261, Lexington Books, 2014;
  • Political Handbook of the World edited by Tom Lansford, page 549, CQ Press.
Demography of Greece:
  • Concise History of Greece (Second edition) by Richard Clogg, Chapter 7, page 238 Cambridge 2002;
  • Vestiges of the Ottoman Past: Muslims Under Siege in Contemporary Greek Thrace by A Karakasidou;
  • “Human Rights Watch”;
  • Μuslim Minority of Thrace by the Greek Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Economic chronology in Greece:
Voice of America, CNN, BBC, The New York Times, The Irish Times.
Indian reaction to developments in Greece as of 30 June 2015:  The Times of India.

28 June 2015

‘Media Dancing To Congress’s Tunes’

Liberal economic thinker Surjit S Bhalla speaks to me after being cut short during a televised debate

T
here is a concerted effort on the part of the Congress to project the current NDA government as UPA-3, and the media is playing by its script — well known commentator on economic affairs Surjit S Bhalla believes. His appearance on NDTV on 25 June made him stand out as a panellist who was speaking on technical grounds. Since he was not lent a patient ear, I thought of getting his opinion fully on l’affaire Lalit Modi. This is beyond what is written in his article in The Indian Express that says what Swarajya had said some time ago: Legally, the former IPL commissioner is not a fugitive.
There are so many citizens, including otherwise innocent ones, who have been served notices by the Enforcement Directorate (ED); that does not make them criminals or fugitives, Bhalla says.
Economist Surjit S Bhalla
I began by asking Bhalla why he did not protest on being called first a supporter and then a crony of the BJP on the said channel. He dismissed Sanjay Jha’s rant and said he couldn’t stoop to the Congress spokesman’s level to hit him back. He said he did not mind such epithets coming his way as he had been called a Congress crony, too, in the past.
Citing P Chidambaram’s articles and Jairam Ramesh’s press conferences, Bhalla said there was no difference between what members of the Congress were saying and the impression about the government a section of the media was projecting. If claiming that all of NDA’s programmes were a rehash of UPA’s was not sounding convincing, they hit upon the idea of accusing the present government of corruption as well — so that the BJP in no way looks different from the Congress.
Jairam Ramesh’s statement, “This has never happened in independent India before, where a former chief minister and leader of opposition has batted for a fugitive,” and then the message coming from the Congress that they would not allow Parliament to function in the Monsoon Session — “this is a bravado that comes out of a sinking ship,” Bhalla says.
Bhalla observed that the same documents were circulating across all English-language Indian news channels, with each one claiming it to be an exclusive story. When the script is so much alike, he believes, it cannot happen without someone dictating terms to the channels from the backstage. “The consistency in the approach of mainstream media suggests there is coordination going on. Each person is not doing an investigation,” Bhalla asserts.
The head of Oxus Investments finds Times Now given the most to hyperventilation followed by NDTV and India Today. “They are immensely biased; they need to be exposed,” he said.
I tell him that the Hindi language channels that I surfed did not seem to be fixated with Lalit Modi. Bhalla says, “Then one can talk about a conspiracy in a much cleaner manner.”
“I have said to these English channels that if there is an issue of national import, and not a local/Delhi issue, I don’t want to be there with an AAP guy. These channels — Times Now, NDTV and India Today — try to push these guys. What locus standi do they have? I just don’t understand. Basically it is to build up (a controversy to malign the government). This is something unusual. It cannot be that they can’t find anybody else. What I strongly feel and object to is that the news is much more biased than it has ever been. I have a lot of evidence to support that,” Bhalla said.
On the deal that Niyant Heritage Hotels Pvt Ltd of Dushyant Singh, son of Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje, had with Ananda Heritage Hotels Pvt Ltd of Lalit Modi via Mauritius-based Wilton Investments Ltd, Bhalla says that at the time of this deal, such transactions were not illegal. The previous government, he says, came under pressure of constant allegations of corruption against it and made the new rule banning such transactions later. While the new rule came into force in 2013, the Dushyant-Lalit deal is dated 2012 and before.
Bhalla calls it the “Robert Vadra Amendment”!
“If there is a disproportionate increase in your assets or valuation,” he says, “then the Enforcement Directorate can look into it even though you have filed your tax returns.” This new rule was made after IAS officer Ashok Khemka took exception to Vadra’s deals with real estate giant DLF. “Dushyant Singh is not liable for it because that law was passed after his deal with Lalit Modi,” Bhalla says. Only NDTV anchor Sreenivasan Jain pointed it out, the economist notes, but then he let it pass.
“Assume for a moment that this was wrong — I don’t think anybody doubts it happened — then what happens to Robert Vadra?” Bhalla questions, shaking his head vehemently in disagreement and then sighing, “Don’t these guys realise this?”
That brings us to the issue of retrospective application of law, where the economist finds it surprising that Finance Minister Arun Jaitley is not taking the decisive step of declaring null and void the law introduced by Pranab Mukherjee (now the President of India) as the UPA-2’s Finance Minister. Saying that the government will not appeal against the Bombay High Court’s October 2014 verdict favouring Vodafone is not enough, he believes, because the issue came back to haunt in March 2015 in the form of the government demanding Minimum Alternate Tax from companies. “Jaitley made the stupidest statement ever on this saying, ‘I can use this money for irrigation,’” Bhalla does not think the government explanation washes.
And then the liability suddenly reduces from Rs 38,000-45,000 crore to Rs 6,500-7,000 crore because of taxation treaties with Singapore, Mauritius and other countries, Bhalla notes, amused.
He says that the Prevention of Corruption Act made by the UPA stated that a minister or a bureaucrat would be liable for his decisions even after he is no longer responsible for the job or even after he has retired. This, Bhalla says, is the official explanation of Jaitley for wanting to change the law.
“I also have a mischievous explanation,” he says. “A lot of stuff that’s happening — and I’ve got confirmation of this from one of the ministries — everybody in the senior bureaucracy is beholden to the Congress. Most of the senior industrialists in the country also are beholden to the Congress. So, what better way than carry out a calculated campaign in the mainstream media that there is not a dime’s worth of difference between them and us?” Bhalla theorises, adding, “And what better way there is to demonstrate the point than the retrospective taxes?”
Why the Narendra Modi government is making the job of the Congress easier by persisting with some of the worst Congress-era laws and regulations is beyond Bhalla. But he is sure the media has a strong pro-Congress agenda. “Doesn’t Narendra Modi realise what’s going on?” he asks.
Before I met with him Saturday morning, I had found an industry angle to it in my talks with some BJP leaders, too. Mukesh Ambani, they allege, is peeved about two developments since the new government took over: The decision on oil prices and arrest of some people associated with Reliance Industries in the recent case of corporate espionage. The NDA government last October decided that Reliance would continue to get the old price of $4.2 mmBtu till it makes up for the shortfall in output from the KG-D6 block. Then in February this year, a Reliance Industries employee was arrested for being the recipient of leaked confidential government documents of Petroleum Ministry.
And Mukesh Ambani owns or has heavy stakes in more than half of the media industry. I share this theory floated by some BJP leaders with Bhalla. He does not rule it out.
The main story, he says, is that the BCCI is widely believed to be corrupt, as corrupt as the FIFA is believed to be, and many politicians and cricket administrators are embroiled in it. “I don’t think anybody should be protected,” Bhalla says, adding, “That is the larger story.”
He believes the only positive outcome that the IPL controversy could have is the government making a law to ban politicians’ entry into sports administrations. That would mean first asking the likes of BJP president Amit Shah and MP Anurag Thakur to leave. Even Narendra Modi or Arun Jaitley should not be running cricket bodies. “What do they know about cricket?” Bhalla questions. He believes it is time the prime minister sent across a strong message to everyone by taking this bold step abruptly.
He mentions here that there is no doubt Lalit Modi is a dubious character. “I have no illusion that he is Mother Teresa’s first cousin,” Bhalla quips, but then underscores the fact that it is not the legal position about him.
Elaborating on the media bias, Bhalla pointed at the debate on NDTV in the night of 26 June in which Vishnu Som talks about former judges of the Supreme Court Justice Jeevan Reddy, Justice SB Sinha and Justice UC Banerjee who “gave their legal opinion” — they did not depose — on the matter in a case in the United Kingdom involving Lalit Modi. The anchor insinuated that the judges’ integrity might have been compromised, Bhalla noted, and said this view of NDTV was untenable.
“It happens all the time. Legal opinions are sought from experts, and they give their views. In this case, they happened to be (retired) Supreme Court judges,” Bhalla said. If they couldn’t get hold of a judge, even that would be held against them, he argued.
“Every time these channels have been badly cornered, they change the terms of the debate,” Bhalla said, adding, “It is no longer about a fugitive.”

Google+ Followers

Follow by Email

Policy

Surajit Dasgupta treats no individual, organisation or institution as a holy cow.